The honest answer depends on bankroll size, session length, and what you actually want from the game.
Pick the original Sweet Bonanza if…
You're playing long sessions on a small to mid bankroll. The 21,100x cap is more than enough for any realistic session, and the bonus economy is the most studied of the three. You'll find the widest RTP-version availability across operators, so it's easier to find the 96.51% build live.
Pick Sweet Bonanza 1000 if…
You want the Super Scatter mechanic without committing to the 2500's variance ceiling. The 1000 is the middle ground: faster bonus tempo than the original thanks to dual trigger paths, capped at a sensible 25,000x, and the Super Scatter values stay readable on the screen.
Pick Sweet Bonanza 2500 if…
You're a max-win hunter and you accept the trade-off. The 2500x Super Scatter values shift a lot of the game's expected value into rare, high-magnitude bonuses. Most rounds will pay less than on the original or 1000 because the math has to fund the tail. If your goal is to chase a single 25,000x screenshot, this is the variant; if your goal is bonus-to-bonus consistency, it isn't.
One bankroll note: high-volatility builds with extreme caps can drain a stake faster than the trigger frequency suggests. Use session limits, treat the Buy Feature as a budgeted purchase, and never chase. The how to play Sweet Bonanza 2500 guide covers stake-sizing recommendations against the typical variance.
Verdict
Original wins for casual/grinder players. The 1000 wins for most everyday players who want the Super Scatter feel. The 2500 wins for max-win specialists and short-session high rollers — and only them.